Verification Process
How Thamizhi ensures news accuracy through multi-layer verification.
Verification is the cornerstone of trust in Thamizhi. Our multi-layer system combines AI efficiency with human judgment to ensure accuracy.
The Three-Layer System
Section titled “The Three-Layer System”Layer 1: AI Pre-screening
Section titled “Layer 1: AI Pre-screening”Automatic processing within minutes
The AI pipeline performs initial verification:
- Content analysis: Checks for factual consistency
- Duplicate detection: Identifies similar stories
- Source verification: Validates referenced information
- Bias detection: Flags potential one-sided reporting
- Quality scoring: Rates overall reliability
What AI checks:
- Grammar and clarity
- Logical consistency
- Factual claims against known databases
- Image authenticity (reverse search)
- Link validity
Limitations:
- Cannot verify eyewitness accounts
- May miss cultural context
- Struggles with satire or irony
- Needs human judgment for complex issues
Layer 2: Community Review
Section titled “Layer 2: Community Review”24-48 hours of peer evaluation
Community members review submissions:
- Accuracy voting: Upvote/downvote on factual claims
- Comment feedback: Questions and suggestions
- Source verification: Community validates references
- Context addition: Members add background information
- Bias identification: Community flags potential issues
Community review process:
- Submission appears in review queue
- Qualified reviewers examine content
- They vote on accuracy (1-5 scale)
- Comments provide detailed feedback
- Author can respond and revise
- Final community vote determines outcome
Reviewer qualifications:
- Account age > 30 days
- Reputation score > 70
- Active participation history
- No recent violations
Layer 3: Expert Validation
Section titled “Layer 3: Expert Validation”Specialized review for complex topics
Subject matter experts verify:
- Technical accuracy: For scientific or technical claims
- Legal compliance: For legal or regulatory content
- Medical accuracy: For health-related information
- Historical facts: For historical claims
- Cultural context: For cultural or social topics
Expert network:
- Verified professionals in various fields
- Academic researchers
- Industry specialists
- Community leaders with domain expertise
When expert validation is triggered:
- High-impact stories
- Technical or scientific claims
- Legal or medical content
- Controversial topics
- Community request
Verification Status
Section titled “Verification Status”Every story shows its verification level:
| Status | Meaning | Trust Level |
|---|---|---|
| 🟡 Pending | Awaiting review | Low |
| 🔵 AI Verified | Passed AI screening | Medium |
| 🟢 Community Verified | Community approved | High |
| 🟣 Expert Verified | Expert validated | Very High |
| 🔴 Disputed | Accuracy questioned | Variable |
The Verification Timeline
Section titled “The Verification Timeline”Submission → AI Screening (minutes) → Community Review (24-48h) → Publication ↓ Expert Validation (if needed) ↓ Final VerificationFactors Affecting Verification Speed
Section titled “Factors Affecting Verification Speed”Faster verification:
- Clear, well-structured submissions
- Multiple credible sources
- Author with good reputation
- Straightforward factual content
- No controversial claims
Slower verification:
- Complex or technical content
- Controversial or sensitive topics
- Author with limited history
- Need for expert validation
- Community disagreement
After Verification
Section titled “After Verification”Verified Stories
Section titled “Verified Stories”- Appear in main feed with verification badge
- Higher visibility in search results
- Contribute to author’s reputation
- Eligible for platform promotion
Disputed Stories
Section titled “Disputed Stories”- Flagged with dispute notice
- Author can appeal or revise
- Community discussion encouraged
- May be removed if unresolvable
Improving Verification Outcomes
Section titled “Improving Verification Outcomes”For authors:
- Provide multiple sources
- Include context and background
- Respond to community feedback
- Build reputation over time
- Be transparent about limitations
For reviewers:
- Focus on facts, not opinions
- Provide constructive feedback
- Vote consistently
- Report genuine issues
- Help authors improve
Verification Metrics
Section titled “Verification Metrics”Track your verification performance:
- Approval rate: Percentage of submissions verified
- Average review time: How quickly your content is reviewed
- Community feedback score: Average rating from reviewers
- Expert validation rate: How often expert review is needed
Common Verification Issues
Section titled “Common Verification Issues”Q: Why was my submission rejected? A: Check the feedback for specific reasons. Common issues include insufficient sources, factual errors, or bias.
Q: Can I appeal a verification decision? A: Yes, you can appeal through the dispute process. Provide additional evidence or context.
Q: How do I become a qualified reviewer? A: Build your reputation through accurate submissions and helpful community engagement.
Q: What if I disagree with community verification? A: You can flag the story for expert review or provide additional evidence in comments.
Next Steps
Section titled “Next Steps”- Learn about Reputation System to understand trust scoring
- Read Community Guidelines for detailed rules
- Explore AI Pipeline for technical details